The pre-tree rules machinery is deleted: no row ever carried a rules array or a non-default match mode (verified in the dev DB), the web never read the envelope keys, and the Android app consumes none of it. Dead code gets no documentation. Removed: - PUT /api/collections/:id/match-mode — endpoint, route, and the UpdateCollectionMatchMode query. The tree's root mode owns any|all. - auto_assign_rules / rule_match_mode from every envelope (create/list/detail/update), from the create/update request shapes, and from the schema: both columns DROPPED (schema.sql carries idempotent DROP COLUMN IF EXISTS heals for existing DBs; sqlc regenerated). - The rules CRUD service layer (AddRule/SetRuleEnabled/RemoveRule + validateRule + UpdateCollectionRulesJSON), ParseRules / EnabledRules / IsSmartCollection, RulesToFilterTree (+ the SSR preload branch), the legacy branch of EvaluateSmartMembership, and SmartEvalOptions.MatchMode. IsCollectionSmart = tree presence; create-path isSmart = collection_type=smart OR a filter_tree. Kept (live consumers): POST /api/collections/preview still evaluates rules payloads in memory (the custom-section builder's preview), and include_auto stays on the list (the Android app sends it). The custom-section builder's SAVE was already broken — its stringified auto_assign_rules payload failed request binding (probed live: 400 invalid request). Create now rejects that payload loudly with a 400 naming the retirement, instead of silently creating a hollow static section; custom-section-builder.md carries the flag. The builder's tree migration remains the flagged follow-up. Test-side (asymmetry rule — deleted behavior, deleted tests): TestPodcastSmartCollections rewritten onto trees (mode lives in the tree root), match-mode subtests and tree_wins_over_legacy_rules deleted, TestRulesToFilterTree deleted, contract-pin envelope keys retracted per the contract_pins 2026-10-31 retirement entry. Mirrors hand-synced: openapi.yaml, bruno create/update, docs/api/*.md, docs/schema.go, api.d.ts. Full container suite green (155s).
284 lines
6.3 KiB
Go
284 lines
6.3 KiB
Go
package services
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bookhoard/internal/database"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/pgtype"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_Equality(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
Genre: pgtype.Text{String: "Science Fiction", Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Science Fiction",
|
|
Priority: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 1 evaluation, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !evaluations[0].Matches {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule to match, but it didn't")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].Confidence <= 0.85 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected confidence > 0.85, got %f", evaluations[0].Confidence)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_NoMatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
Genre: pgtype.Text{String: "Fantasy", Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Science Fiction",
|
|
Priority: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 1 evaluation, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].Matches {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule not to match, but it did")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].Confidence != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected confidence 0, got %f", evaluations[0].Confidence)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_Contains(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
Series: pgtype.Text{String: "The Expanse", Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "series",
|
|
Operator: "contains",
|
|
Value: "Expanse",
|
|
Priority: 7,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 1 evaluation, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !evaluations[0].Matches {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule to match, but it didn't")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].Confidence <= 0.9 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected confidence > 0.9 with priority boost, got %f", evaluations[0].Confidence)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_PriorityOrder(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
Genre: pgtype.Text{String: "Science Fiction", Valid: true},
|
|
Series: pgtype.Text{String: "Foundation", Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Science Fiction",
|
|
Priority: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-2",
|
|
Field: "series",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Foundation",
|
|
Priority: 9,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 2 evaluations, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].RuleID != "rule-2" {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule-2 (higher priority) to be first, got %s", evaluations[0].RuleID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[1].RuleID != "rule-1" {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule-1 (lower priority) to be second, got %s", evaluations[1].RuleID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].Confidence <= evaluations[1].Confidence {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected higher priority rule to have higher confidence")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_CopyrightYear(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
CopyrightYear: pgtype.Int4{Int32: 2020, Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "copyright_year",
|
|
Operator: "greater_than",
|
|
Value: "2019",
|
|
Priority: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 1 evaluation, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !evaluations[0].Matches {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule to match (2020 > 2019), but it didn't")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_MissingField(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Science Fiction",
|
|
Priority: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 1 evaluation, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[0].Matches {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected rule not to match when field is missing, but it did")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_CaseInsensitive(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
Genre: pgtype.Text{String: "science fiction", Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "SCIENCE FICTION",
|
|
Priority: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 1 evaluation, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !evaluations[0].Matches {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected case-insensitive match, but it didn't match")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEvaluateRules_PriorityBoost(t *testing.T) {
|
|
service := &CollectionService{}
|
|
|
|
mediaItem := database.MediaItems{
|
|
Genre: pgtype.Text{String: "Science Fiction", Valid: true},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rules := []Rule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-1",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Science Fiction",
|
|
Priority: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "rule-2",
|
|
Field: "genre",
|
|
Operator: "equals",
|
|
Value: "Science Fiction",
|
|
Priority: 10,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
evaluations := service.EvaluateRules(mediaItem, 0, rules)
|
|
|
|
if len(evaluations) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 2 evaluations, got %d", len(evaluations))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Higher priority (10) should give higher confidence than lower priority (1)
|
|
// Genre base confidence is 0.9
|
|
// Priority 1: 0.9 + 0.01 = 0.91
|
|
// Priority 10: 0.9 + 0.1 = 1.0 (capped)
|
|
if evaluations[0].Confidence != 1.0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected higher priority confidence to be 1.0, got %f", evaluations[0].Confidence)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if evaluations[1].Confidence != 0.91 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected lower priority confidence to be 0.91, got %f", evaluations[1].Confidence)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The higher priority rule should come first (sorted by priority descending)
|
|
if evaluations[0].RuleID != "rule-2" {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected higher priority rule to be first, got %s", evaluations[0].RuleID)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRulesToFilterTree retired 2026-10-31 with the function it tested:
|
|
// rules-array storage is gone, the filter tree is the only smart
|
|
// membership. (Tests of deleted behavior are deleted — the asymmetry
|
|
// rule.)
|